In case the common-sense conclusion that this book is overtly pornographic isn’t satisfying, Merriam-Webster stipulates that pornography is “the depiction of erotic behavior intended to cause sexual excitement,” a fitting description for the book given that, according to its Amazon description, it focuses on “bonding with friends over erotic gay fanfiction” and features sexually explicit images. The book, it continues, “is intended for a teenage and young adult audience and, in my opinion would be considered a valuable resource.” “I feel it is important to see these images and quotations in context of the full text,” the email screenshot says, although no context could ever justify showcasing gay pornography to minors, all of which was done on the taxpayer’s dime. Sanzi posted a screenshot of an email she says is from Auger, which insists the book is not pornographic and compares the book to the work of Renaissance artist Michelangelo or an anatomy textbook. Erika Sanzi reported on her Substack blog that another concerned parent had emailed Auger about the “inappropriate” book, which features multiple graphic scenes of gay men having sex, discussion of sexual fantasies, and even an instance where a girl is encouraged by her sibling to “taste” herself.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |